The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of so much more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to check your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
We have singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the ideal mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Ibaby vs Infant Optics
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they have been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are favored by consumers for their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn out due to prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine. Ibaby vs Infant Optics
Infant Optics or Motorola
At approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) isn’t encouraged as this will make them lose a percentage of their charge each month, so prepare to spend on replacements frequently. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same characteristics for a much older model. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for bigger kids that are capable of walking around more.. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with a program that you will need to download, etc. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. We’re quite certain that the far cheaperthe Infant Optics model can definitely do the exact same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an roughly $60 price gap.
Conclusion Ibaby vs Infant Optics
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice amongst These baby monitors that we have established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Ibaby vs Infant Optics