Accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was designed in the 30’s It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of so much more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to monitor your baby’s safety and status without difficulty which means that the baby monitor you buy must do exactly what it is created to do
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36xl
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn out due to prolonged hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries may be replaced as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. Alternatively, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen would still look okay. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36xl
Infant Optics or Motorola
Also appearing on the ranks of best baby monitors out there, albeit in the lower ranks, the Motorola MBP36XL is also a contender which is also approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8 Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Infant Optics’ setup is quite simple as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just put in the battery
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a portion of their total charge every month, so expect to need replacements often because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is hard to dismiss with captivating features such as customizable outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the features are also available. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.
It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. We’re quite certain that the far cheaperthe Infant Optics model can definitely do the same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an roughly $60 price gap.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36xl
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36xl