Accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
We have singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of options available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the right mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Don’t like reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they’ve been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are preferred by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a known fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries can be substituted as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. On the other hand, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen could still look fine. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics’ installation is quite easy as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just put in the battery
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) is not encouraged as this will make them lose a percentage of their charge each month, so prepare to spend on replacements often. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there is visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the attributes that the Motorola model has actually becomes being quite counter-intuitive and will need that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you play up to 5 pre-recorded lullabies, which unfortunately also hides the sound your child may make
In general, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to ignore this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same characteristics for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for larger kids who are capable of moving around more.. The second is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. More steps have to be taken in order to set it up as a program must be downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be a problem. The same security problems won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on having to go online for it’s end-to-end picture and sound output.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 difference, we are pretty certain the far more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam