Accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was designed in the 30’s It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Currently, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to monitor your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
We have singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for several years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Don’t like reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Philips Avent Scd630
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they’ve been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market.
Due to their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are favored by consumers. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn out because of extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be okay. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Philips Avent Scd630
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics’ installation is quite simple as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just insert the battery
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) is not encouraged as this will make them lose a portion of their charge every month, so prepare to spend on replacements frequently. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the attributes that the Motorola model has actually ends up being quite counter-intuitive and will need that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you activate up to 5 pre-recorded songs, which unfortunately also masks the sound your child may make
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to ignore this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. The exact same security problems won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on having to go online for it is end-to-end picture and sound output.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 difference, we are pretty sure the much cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Philips Avent Scd630
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Philips Avent Scd630