The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Currently, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does what it is created to do: enable you to monitor your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
We have singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for several years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Don’t like reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they have been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are preferred by customers for their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a known fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries may be substituted as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. On the other hand, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen could still look fine. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
Infant Optics or Motorola
Also showing up on the ranks of best baby monitors out there, albeit in the lower ranks, the Motorola MBP36XL is also a contender which is also roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8 While many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a portion of their total charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there is visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the features that the Motorola model has actually becomes being quite counter-intuitive and will need that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you activate up to 5 pre-recorded lullabies, which unfortunately also hides the sound your child may make
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the characteristics are also available. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for bigger kids who are capable of walking around more.. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (such as extreme crying), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. More steps have to be taken in order to set it up as a program must be downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With approximately a $60 price gap, we are pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w