Accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to check your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Infant Optics vs Arlo Baby
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace.
Due to their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are favored by customers. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is most suitable for nighttime, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourinfant and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is ideal for viewing the whole nursery While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a known truth that baby monitors tend to burn out due to extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries can be replaced as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay. Infant Optics vs Arlo Baby
Infant Optics or Motorola
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) isn’t encouraged as this will make them lose a percentage of their charge every month, so prepare to spend on replacements frequently. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there’s visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the features that the Motorola model has actually ends up being quite counter-intuitive and will require that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you play up to 5 pre-recorded lullabies, which unfortunately also hides the sound your child may make
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to ignore this new kid on the block.
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the characteristics are also available. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for bigger kids that are capable of walking around more.. The next is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. More steps have to be taken in order to set it up as an app has to downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be an issue. The same security issues won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on having to go online for it is end-to-end picture and sound output.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. We’re quite certain that the far cheaperthe Infant Optics model can definitely do the same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an approximately $60 price gap.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Arlo Baby
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice amongst All these baby monitors that we’ve established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Arlo Baby