Accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was designed in the 30’s It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: allow you to check your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
we’ve singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the ideal combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Don’t like reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Infant Optics vs Arlo
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they have been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace.
Because of their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are favored by customers. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is most suitable for nighttime, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourinfant and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is ideal for viewing the entire nursery While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be okay. Infant Optics vs Arlo
Infant Optics or Motorola
At approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their total charge every month, so expect to need replacements often because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there’s visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to ignore this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for larger kids that are capable of moving around more.. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. The exact same security problems won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on the Internet for it is end-to-end audio and video output.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. we are quite certain that the much cheaperthe Infant Optics model can definitely do the exact same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an approximately $60 difference.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Arlo
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Arlo