The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to monitor your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Don’t like reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Infant Optics vs Cocoon Cam
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they’ve been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is best for nighttime, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourbaby and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is ideal for viewing the entire nursery While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn out because of extended hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries can be substituted as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Alternatively, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen could still look fine. Infant Optics vs Cocoon Cam
Infant Optics or Motorola
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) is not encouraged as this will make them lose a portion of their charge each month, so prepare to spend on replacements often. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is tough to dismiss with amazing features such as customizable outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 price gap, we are pretty certain the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Cocoon Cam
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice amongst These baby monitors that we’ve established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Cocoon Cam