The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: allow you to monitor your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the right mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Don’t like reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics vs Ibaby
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn out due to prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries may be replaced as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. On the other hand, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen could still look okay. Infant Optics vs Ibaby
Infant Optics or Motorola
At approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Infant Optics’ installation is quite simple as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just insert the battery
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a portion of their total charge every month, so expect to need replacements often because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for larger kids that are capable of moving around more.. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 price gap, we’re pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Ibaby
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Ibaby