Accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to monitor your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
we’ve singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the ideal mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics vs Levana
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they have been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market.
Because of their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are favored by consumers. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is most suitable for night, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourinfant and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is perfect for viewing the whole nursery While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be okay. Infant Optics vs Levana
Infant Optics or Motorola
Also appearing on the ranks of best baby monitors out there, albeit in the lower ranks, the Motorola MBP36XL is also a contender which is also approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8 Though many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Infant Optics’ installation is quite easy as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just insert the battery
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a portion of their total charge every month, so expect to need replacements often because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there is visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to ignore this new kid on the block.
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the features are also available. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. Additional steps have to be taken in order to set it up as a program must be downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 price gap, we’re pretty certain the far more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Levana
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Levana