Accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Currently, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to monitor your child’s safety and status without difficulty which means that the baby monitor you buy must do what it is created to do
We have singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics vs Lollipop
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they have been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market.
Due to their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are preferred by customers. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is most suitable for nighttime, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourinfant and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is ideal for viewing the whole nursery While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a known truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay. Infant Optics vs Lollipop
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their total charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the features that the Motorola model has actually ends up being quite counter-intuitive and will require that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you play up to 5 pre-recorded songs, which unfortunately also masks the sound your child may make
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is hard to ignore with captivating features such as customizable outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same characteristics for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (such as extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. The exact same security issues won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on the Internet for it’s end-to-end audio and video output.
It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. We’re quite certain that the much more affordablethe Infant Optics model can definitely do the same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an roughly $60 price gap.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Lollipop
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice amongst All these baby monitors that we’ve established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Lollipop