The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of so much more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to check your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics vs Motorola Baby Monitor
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market.
Due to their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are favored by customers. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is best for night, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourbaby and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is perfect for viewing the whole nursery While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a known truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine. Infant Optics vs Motorola Baby Monitor
Infant Optics or Motorola
Also showing up on the ranks of best baby monitors out there, albeit in the lower ranks, the Motorola MBP36XL is also a contender which is also roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8 Though many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a portion of their total charge each month, so expect to need replacements often because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the attributes that the Motorola model has actually becomes being quite counter-intuitive and will need that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you activate up to 5 pre-recorded songs, which unfortunately also hides the sound your child may make
In general, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to ignore this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the characteristics are also available. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for bigger kids that are capable of walking around more.. The next is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. More steps have to be taken in order to set it up as an app has to downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With approximately a $60 difference, we are pretty certain the far more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Motorola Baby Monitor
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice amongst These baby monitors that we’ve established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Motorola Baby Monitor