Accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was designed in the 30’s It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to check your baby’s safety and status without difficulty which means that the baby monitor you buy must do what it’s created to do
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the ideal combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Infant Optics vs Nanit
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market.
Both baby monitors are preferred by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is most suitable for nighttime, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourbaby and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is ideal for viewing the whole nursery While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a known truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries can be replaced as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Alternatively, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen could still look fine. Infant Optics vs Nanit
Infant Optics or Motorola
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics’ setup is quite simple as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just put in the battery
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) is not encouraged as this will make them lose a percentage of their charge every month, so prepare to spend on replacements often. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there’s visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to dismiss this new kid on the block.
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be an issue. The same security issues won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on having to go online for it is end-to-end picture and sound output.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. we are quite certain that the far cheaperthe Infant Optics model can definitely do the same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an approximately $60 difference.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Nanit
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice amongst These baby monitors that we’ve established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Nanit