Accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Currently, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to monitor your baby’s safety and status with ease which means that the baby monitor you buy must do what it’s created to do
we’ve singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the right mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Infant Optics vs Nest
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market.
Because of their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are preferred by consumers. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is best for night, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourinfant and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is ideal for viewing the entire nursery While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a known truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries may be substituted as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay. Infant Optics vs Nest
Infant Optics or Motorola
At approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) is not encouraged as this will make them lose a portion of their charge every month, so prepare to spend on replacements often. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there’s visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the attributes that the Motorola model has actually ends up being quite counter-intuitive and will need that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you play up to 5 pre-recorded lullabies, which unfortunately also hides the sound your child may make
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is hard to ignore with amazing features such as customizable outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the features are readily available. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be an issue. The same security issues won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on the Internet for it’s end-to-end audio and video output.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. we are quite certain that the far cheaperthe Infant Optics model can definitely do the exact same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an roughly $60 price gap.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Nest
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice amongst All these baby monitors that we have established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Nest