Accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to check your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
We have singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for several years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the right mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics vs Philips Avent
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they have been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace.
Because of their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are favored by customers. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is best for night, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourbaby and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is perfect for viewing the whole nursery While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a known fact that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries may be substituted as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine. Infant Optics vs Philips Avent
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics’ setup is quite easy as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just put in the battery
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a portion of their total charge each month, so expect to need replacements often because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the entire room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there’s visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the features are also available. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (such as extreme crying), which is beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you need to download, etc. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 difference, we are pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Philips Avent
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Philips Avent