Accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was designed in the 30’s It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of so much more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to check your child’s safety and status with ease which means that the baby monitor you buy must do exactly what it is created to do
we’ve singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of options available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Infant Optics vs Samsung
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is best for night, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourbaby and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is ideal for viewing the whole nursery While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. On the other hand, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen could still look fine. Infant Optics vs Samsung
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Also appearing on the ranks of best baby monitors out there, albeit in the lower ranks, the Motorola MBP36XL is also a contender which is also roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8 Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics’ setup is quite simple as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just insert the battery
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) isn’t encouraged as this will make them lose a percentage of their charge every month, so prepare to spend on replacements often. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the attributes that the Motorola model has actually ends up being quite counter-intuitive and will require that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you play up to 5 pre-recorded lullabies, which unfortunately also masks the sound your child may make
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is hard to dismiss with captivating features such as customizable outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. Additional steps have to be taken in order to set it up as an app has to downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. The exact same security problems won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on having to go online for it’s end-to-end picture and sound output.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 difference, we’re pretty sure the much cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Samsung
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice amongst All these baby monitors that we have established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Samsung