Accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Currently, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to check your child’s safety and status with ease which means that the baby monitor you buy must do what it’s created to do
We have singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for several years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Don’t like reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Infant Optics vs Vtech
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they’ve been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market.
Because of their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are preferred by consumers. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common fact that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine. Infant Optics vs Vtech
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Also appearing on the ranks of best baby monitors out there, albeit in the lower ranks, the Motorola MBP36XL is also a contender which is also approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8 While many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) is not encouraged as this will make them lose a portion of their charge each month, so prepare to spend on replacements frequently. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the whole room. Both models have tilting and panning controls for their camera however there is visible static on the Motorola MBP36XL while and a bit after it is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to dismiss this new kid on the block.
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. Being able to move where the camera is looking remotely is a useful feature for larger kids that are capable of moving around more.. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. More steps have to be taken in order to set it up as an app has to downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. The same security problems won’t be faced with the Infant Optics DXR-8′ due to the use of radio frequencies rather than the reliance on the Internet for it’s end-to-end audio and video output.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With roughly a $60 price gap, we’re pretty sure the much cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Vtech
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice amongst These baby monitors that we’ve established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Infant Optics vs Vtech