Accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was designed in the 30’s It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of so much more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to monitor your baby’s safety and status without difficulty which means that the baby monitor you buy must do exactly what it is created to do
we’ve singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Levana vs Infant Optics
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market.
Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. These lenses vary from the low-light model which is most suitable for nighttime, the telephoto lens which can be controlled remotely and will let you zoom into yourinfant and lastly, the wide-angle lens which is perfect for viewing the entire nursery While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered active). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. On the other hand, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen would still look fine. Levana vs Infant Optics
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics’ installation is quite simple as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just insert the battery
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a portion of their total charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a few of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is hard to dismiss with amazing features such as customizable outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the characteristics are readily available. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme crying), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. More steps have to be taken in order to set it up as an app must be downloaded on your phone as well as connected to a home wi-fi. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. We’re quite certain that the far cheaperthe Infant Optics model can definitely do the exact same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an roughly $60 difference.
Conclusion Levana vs Infant Optics
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Levana vs Infant Optics