Accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting, the very first baby monitor was developed in the 30’s It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of so much more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Currently, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The point here being that at any given time of day, you will be able to check your child’s safety and status with ease which means that the baby monitor you buy must do exactly what it is created to do
we’ve singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 got our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on the different possible baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy Space View Motorola vs Infant Optics
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019 Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace.
Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 batteries can be substituted as it runs on lithium-ion batteries While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae are not that stable. On the other hand, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen would still look fine. Motorola vs Infant Optics
Infant Optics or Motorola
At approximately $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 quality which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics’ setup is quite simple as compared to the Motorola unit which requires a screwdriver to just put in the battery
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. Due to the nature of NiMH batteries, overcharging (keeping the device plugged) isn’t encouraged as this will make them lose a portion of their charge every month, so prepare to spend on replacements frequently. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the attributes that the Motorola model has actually ends up being quite counter-intuitive and will need that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you play up to 5 pre-recorded songs, which unfortunately also masks the sound your child may make
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is hard to dismiss with captivating features such as customizable outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
Although the Infant Optics DXR-8 is an older model, majority of the features are readily available. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (such as extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With approximately a $60 difference, we are pretty sure the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Motorola vs Infant Optics
Being a very important investment for the safety of your child, the Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice amongst All these baby monitors that we have established. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority. Motorola vs Infant Optics