The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of so much more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security (which is necessary nowadays), and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the “fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to monitor your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
we’ve singled out one product that seems to have, and has gotten it right for many years now from the abundance of choices available. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Prefer a video instead of reading? For information on different baby monitors like Infant Optics DXR-8, check out this video from Babylist.
Infant Optics or Eufy Space? Nanit vs Infant Optics
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. Since 2019, they’ve been pushing each other out on the top spot on reviewers’ lists. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market.
Due to their ease of use at home, both baby monitors are preferred by consumers. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edges over the Eufy Space View are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared.
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn out because of extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is runs on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Finally, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; then we could say that its antennae aren’t that stable. Alternatively, a fall from a medium height and the Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen could still look fine. Nanit vs Infant Optics
Infant Optics or Motorola
At roughly $20 cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 quality that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit still requires a screwdriver to insert the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this model. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their total charge each month, so expect to need replacements often because of this, overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some visual noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features
One of the features that the Motorola model has actually becomes being quite counter-intuitive and will need that you set it up rather close to your child as the MBP36XL has a feature which lets you play up to 5 pre-recorded songs, which unfortunately also hides the sound your child may make
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics or Netgear?
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such release that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. This new kid on the block is hard to ignore with captivating features such as customizable outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, HD recording, night light, and lullabies
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. One distinct feature, the temperature monitoring (which is important to prevent SIDS), which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening.
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics‘ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an wi-fi connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. We’re quite certain that the much more affordablethe Infant Optics model can definitely do the same job as the Arlo Baby without putting a huge dent in your wallet especially with an roughly $60 difference.
Conclusion Nanit vs Infant Optics
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority. Nanit vs Infant Optics